It’s right there in the first line of Penn State
University’s history: “From agricultural
college to world-class learning community – the story of The Pennsylvania State University is one of an expanding mission of teaching, research, and public
service.”
Nowhere in the
description of its mission does Penn State mention football, though some reports have noted that the university’s athletics program’s motto is “Success
with Honor.”
This week, even the
student protesters on the Penn State campus would be hard pressed to suggest
that the university had lived up to its mission of education and public service
or that the leaders of its football program understood the role of honor.
Colleges and
universities have a special place in society, different from those of most
other institutions and organizations. They are communities held together by common purpose and values, and they are meant to be sanctuaries where ideas are tested, thought is emboldened, and moral courage is
strengthened. While the demographics of higher education in the United States
have changed significantly in the past 65 years or so – from upper class to all
classes, from mainly white to a broad spectrum of both Americans and people new
to this country, from young to older – there is still a sense of purpose around
providing a safe and protected setting where youth can find their path in life.
I think this
ultimately is what guided trustees in their decision-making when they fired PSU’s
President Graham Spanier and football coach Joe Paterno after learning that a
number of athletic program and university officials had, according to reports,
failed to act decisively on information that an adjunct member of the football
program had allegedly abused young boys.
Many news reports have
noted that university officials observed “the letter of the law,” following guidelines for reporting such incidents. But, their failure to
understand the higher purpose of their community – to uphold the mission of the
school and its athletic program – triggered the crisis and the trustees’
actions.
Whether you work for
an institution, a brand or a corporation, your greatest vulnerability in any
crisis is what people perceive as your core strength. Failure at the core will
always cause more outcry among your public than an issue generated by an
outside agent.
The lessons of this
week for communicators are to be prepared (the old Scouts’ motto) for crises of
mission or core capability and support efforts (perhaps by Human Resources,
training, or as a topic for all-employee meetings) to reinforce organizational
values, so that everyone understands how to make mission the driver in their
day-to-day work.
Is Your Call Center
Prepared?
Another issue that
made the news this week was the seemingly minor matter of upgrading the Virgin
America website, where many customers make, change and check on reservations.
The resulting computer issues led to calls to Virgin’s 800-number to resolve
reservation problems which resulted in some angry social media accounts of long
hold times and hang-ups.
Since the topic for
today is being prepared: If your call center was experiencing similar issues,
do you know how to record updates on your phone system?
As communicators, we
look for every avenue to message to our audiences during crises. We prepare
talking points and FAQs and place them online and on Facebook and even YouTube.
We update the message on our personal voicemails and the company’s news media
line. We make sure every customer-facing employee has a copy and understands
how to use them.
But, what if your
audience is on hold?
Would your call center
managers know how to access the system, remove Muzak or that awful recording of
“Your call is important to us. Please hold for the next available operator”?
And what would they
say if they could get into the system to record something for all those folks
stranded on hold? A prepared statement may sound too canned to someone whose
blood pressure is rising after 53 minutes on hold. A well-crafted, conversational
message that acknowledges responsibility for the issue and what your company is
doing to resolve it – and the long telephone wait times – may, in some cases,
be all your audience needs. Even if it doesn’t completely resolve the
customer’s issue, getting an update while on hold may put them in a better
frame of mind when they do reach a live operator, so that the conversation
isn’t full of invective.
Your call centers are
important message points for your audience when issues arise. Messaging while
on hold is another avenue for communicating issues and alleviating problems.


The Penn State story really hits home for me, Vickie. I was employed by PSU for 12 years and have attended football games in Happy Valley.
ReplyDeleteYou're so right about communications and core missions being important for a university, a program or a business. Tragically, for the victims, Penn State's core strengths were compromised while these atrocities were being committed. While Paterno may have done all that was required legally, he failed both ethically and morally. A sad and sick situation.